Tony Mauro of the First Amendment Center offers an excellent analysis of Monday's oral arguments that echo my own, but are much more extensive and articulate.
USA Today published point/ counterpoint editorials this morning, siding with student speech in the former, and allowing Kenneth Starr, the defendent's lawyer, to make a case for censoring a pro-drug message, and at a minimum, remove the principals liability from punitive damages.
No comments:
Post a Comment